Leading Indicators – Big MISS, But New Orders are HOT!

January 26, 2012 12:26 pm

The Conference Board released the Leading Indicators for the latest period. On the whole, it was a disappointment. Expectations were for a +0.7% and the actual number came in at +0.4% and the previous month was revised lower (SURPRISE!) from +0.5% to +0.2%.

It has always been odd that this index could have such a wide miss as most of the components are know in advance.

This will be the last time for a while that we will be using this and providing information as the Conference Board is changing the makeup of the indicator. Until we can look as the new components and the historical reference as it related to this index, it does not make a whole lot of sense to even consider it.

Here is a look at the current components and how they added/subtracted to the index this period.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Articles You May Find Useful:

  1. Economics of The Day…Miss, Miss, Miss (No Worries) There was some news that was not inline with the recent surprises...
  2. China’s Leading Indicator – Slowing (Confirming The Hard Landing Thesis) China is showing a slowdown. Generally there is weakness in the economy...
  3. Economic Indicators To Watch This Week There is actually some news that we will see out of the...
  4. ECRI Leading Indices: Conflicting May Be A Good Sign The ECRI Leading Weekly index turned higher this week. That is a...
  5. Leading Indicators: Sorry To Spoil The Party, But… The Conference Board released the Leading Indicators this morning and the number...

2 Responses to “Leading Indicators – Big MISS, But New Orders are HOT!”

  1. randy on January 27th, 2012 9:37 am

    I am interested in your take on the "changes" in this indicator. It seems, like with inflation indices, that when the powers that be don't like the trends, they change the index. I could be wrong, but I have not seen any explanation of why the change. Is there some fundamental underlying economic structureal change that makes a new index necessary? Or do they simply want to make the results look good to pacify the crowd?

  2. Andrew Horowitz on February 1st, 2012 8:00 pm

    I would think that there is a bit of all of the above