<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TDI Podcast 125: The Return Of Frank Curzio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/</link>
	<description>Investment Disciplines and Timely Advice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:15:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-9057</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-9057</guid>
		<description>Tape reading - If someone bought UNG or GAZ from July 2008 to current how would they have done?  Not too good.  Looks like they take one Wyckoff quote and try to build a system off of it to sell to the unsuspecting public. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tape reading &#8211; If someone bought UNG or GAZ from July 2008 to current how would they have done?  Not too good.  Looks like they take one Wyckoff quote and try to build a system off of it to sell to the unsuspecting public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KH Tang</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-9044</link>
		<dc:creator>KH Tang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-9044</guid>
		<description>Good day, Andrew 
When the Law come to curb issuing more shares... 
I logic that it should start to reflect it real value.  What do you think? 
 
I would think that the short sellers are going to be panic in buying back their short. 
And, also that the price keep dropping it does not mean distribution of share at all. 
In fact, it is just opposite, manipulators accumulate all the down with lower price for bigger profit when it got up... 
 
For example.   This article show the picture of GLD is under accumulation with Tape Reading, regardless of the price is up or down. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blessedfool.gaia.com/blog/2009/6/tape-reading---using-the-classical-tool-to-decode-the-market-5&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://blessedfool.gaia.com/blog/2009/6/tape-read...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Best Regards </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good day, Andrew<br />
When the Law come to curb issuing more shares&#8230;<br />
I logic that it should start to reflect it real value.  What do you think? </p>
<p>I would think that the short sellers are going to be panic in buying back their short.<br />
And, also that the price keep dropping it does not mean distribution of share at all.<br />
In fact, it is just opposite, manipulators accumulate all the down with lower price for bigger profit when it got up&#8230; </p>
<p>For example.   This article show the picture of GLD is under accumulation with Tape Reading, regardless of the price is up or down.<br />
<a href="http://blessedfool.gaia.com/blog/2009/6/tape-reading---using-the-classical-tool-to-decode-the-market-5" target="_blank">http://blessedfool.gaia.com/blog/2009/6/tape-read&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Best Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>The ETF can use synthetics to get leverage .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ETF can use synthetics to get leverage .</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skutney</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-9040</link>
		<dc:creator>skutney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-9040</guid>
		<description>Andrew, 
 
  When shares are traded in something like GLD or DUG, is it true that those exchange traded funds trade futures to achieve the objectives of the ETF? If so, in the Commitment of Traders reports are these futures considered Commercials or Non-Commercials? I assume they don&#039;t fall into the non reportable category.  
   
   In the case of exchange related indexes how do commercials take delivery? 
 
  In the Northeast companies are getting ready to start or have started massive drilling projects for natural gas. New York is not letting them drill just yet but when they do I would expect that natural gas prices would be even lower. New piplines have been installed to deliver the natural gas. Just my opinion I have no special knowlege except that I live in the middle of it. 
 
Steve </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, </p>
<p>  When shares are traded in something like GLD or DUG, is it true that those exchange traded funds trade futures to achieve the objectives of the ETF? If so, in the Commitment of Traders reports are these futures considered Commercials or Non-Commercials? I assume they don&#039;t fall into the non reportable category.  </p>
<p>   In the case of exchange related indexes how do commercials take delivery? </p>
<p>  In the Northeast companies are getting ready to start or have started massive drilling projects for natural gas. New York is not letting them drill just yet but when they do I would expect that natural gas prices would be even lower. New piplines have been installed to deliver the natural gas. Just my opinion I have no special knowlege except that I live in the middle of it. </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-8995</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-8995</guid>
		<description>Andrew, good content and discussion with both guests.  Happy labor day weekend to you. 
 
1.  I took 9/3 &amp; 9/4 off from work, had CNBC on for a bit then wised up and turned the sound off after I heard Bob Passano say &quot;Forget about gold, those stocks never lead the market.  Pay attention to these trading on light volume the past 2 days.&quot;  He then showed tickers/prices of AIG, FRE, &amp; FNM.  That&#039;s sick. 
 
2. IMO, CNBC is nothing but a pump machine, with reporters who have absolutely no clue about trading the markets.  Also, quite awhile back you had the guy who started up &quot;Instant Bull&quot; on your show.  That place ended up being nothing more than a foul language message board like Yahoo.  i hope RANsquawk turns out better than that. 
 
2. No doubt the market has participants who have advanced knowledge of moves and information because they pay for it and have friends and interest in the right places. 
 
3. I think Frank will look back and be so thankful thestreet.com let him go. 
 
4. You had James Altucher on awhile back, a Jim Cramer protoge.  Did you see his little clip of him stating 5 reasons why the DOW is going up another 1000-2000 points?  He&#039;s calling a bottom in housing and says we&#039;ll see a surge in consumer spending as never before.  I can&#039;t imagine what planet he is living on. 
Here&#039;s the link.  More market pumping, reporting with no depth or thinking, to brainwash the public. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/5-reasons-to-be-bullish-2009-09-03/6817A216-C916-4167-BE38-E217E84346E6&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/5-reasons-...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, good content and discussion with both guests.  Happy labor day weekend to you. </p>
<p>1.  I took 9/3 &amp; 9/4 off from work, had CNBC on for a bit then wised up and turned the sound off after I heard Bob Passano say &quot;Forget about gold, those stocks never lead the market.  Pay attention to these trading on light volume the past 2 days.&quot;  He then showed tickers/prices of AIG, FRE, &amp; FNM.  That&#039;s sick. </p>
<p>2. IMO, CNBC is nothing but a pump machine, with reporters who have absolutely no clue about trading the markets.  Also, quite awhile back you had the guy who started up &quot;Instant Bull&quot; on your show.  That place ended up being nothing more than a foul language message board like Yahoo.  i hope RANsquawk turns out better than that. </p>
<p>2. No doubt the market has participants who have advanced knowledge of moves and information because they pay for it and have friends and interest in the right places. </p>
<p>3. I think Frank will look back and be so thankful thestreet.com let him go. </p>
<p>4. You had James Altucher on awhile back, a Jim Cramer protoge.  Did you see his little clip of him stating 5 reasons why the DOW is going up another 1000-2000 points?  He&#039;s calling a bottom in housing and says we&#039;ll see a surge in consumer spending as never before.  I can&#039;t imagine what planet he is living on.<br />
Here&#039;s the link.  More market pumping, reporting with no depth or thinking, to brainwash the public. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/5-reasons-to-be-bullish-2009-09-03/6817A216-C916-4167-BE38-E217E84346E6" target="_blank">http://www.marketwatch.com/video/asset/5-reasons-&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-8992</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-8992</guid>
		<description>No podcast as of yet to link </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No podcast as of yet to link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JZA</title>
		<link>http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/2009/09/06/tdi-podcast-125-the-return-of-frank-curzio/comment-page-1/#comment-8980</link>
		<dc:creator>JZA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedisciplinedinvestor.com/blog/?p=4737#comment-8980</guid>
		<description>No link juice to his podcast? How rude :) 
jk 
No seriously.. how can I checkout his podcast, Google is not making me feel lucky. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No link juice to his podcast? How rude :)</p>
<p>jk</p>
<p>No seriously.. how can I checkout his podcast, Google is not making me feel lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

