Audio: DH Unplugged #17

February 26, 2009 10:21 am

gold-bars-2

FYI; You can go to DH Uplugged for the new site that will provide the link for the iTunes store version and subscription (Free). Use that for now on for the RSS FEED of the show and to get up to date information.

——-

Here is our 17th conversation …. new insights for anyone who invests in anything. What to do? This chat is presented as-is for anyone who wants to listen in. We discuss the problems with the market in general and the Obama effect.

Click HERE for charts discussed in the episode.

Click for the pdf of “Where the Money Goes

Play

Sorry, No Related Posts.

5 Responses to “Audio: DH Unplugged #17”

  1. Erich on February 26th, 2009 9:46 pm

    Andrew…I learned a lot about why Afghanistan is so critical to succeeding in the war on terror from the PBS Frontline show: "The War Briefing"

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warbriefi…

  2. Matt on February 26th, 2009 8:17 pm

    The case FOR inflation circa 1933:

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3e0_1235601005

  3. Andrew Horowitz on February 27th, 2009 5:01 am


    Thanks
    Andrew

  4. VPro on February 28th, 2009 2:52 am

    Matt, Not sure I get where you're coming from. Do you think inflation is good and the answer to the financial and economic mess ?

  5. DTB on March 2nd, 2009 7:27 pm

    Andrew, Love these chats and your insights, but I don't always agree with you. I'd have to say Afghanistan has always been the priority for Obama and he has always talked about funding that fight properly so I'm a little shocked you're shocked about any escalation in spending. His view has been very clear as long as you listen to him and not the media recaps.

    I know you understand he's a politician so I'm also a little surprised you expect so much from his speeches. I think he's doing exactly what his job calls for. When I voted for "change" I didn't vote for a change in how to be a politician, I voted for a change in the focus on priorities. And in looking for proof of that change I was encouraged by changes at the SEC in this article:
    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=12024287121…

    The media obviously has skewed the expectation level on what we should be getting from this “change”, but that’s what they do, hope you aren’t getting sucked into thier game of hype and sensationalism…

Got something to say?